Getting Communication Insight From Axios Is Like Getting Nourishment From Toilet Paper

Trying to glean useful info from an Axios newsletter about executive communications, one exec comms director said, "I was wondering if I was having a stroke."

My mother wouldnโ€™t buy us Kraft cheese singles, because, she told us, โ€œIt has all the nutritional value of a roll of toilet paper.โ€

The Axios Communicators newsletter has the same amount of intellectual value.

warned Writing Boots readers earlier this year about the Axios Communicators newsletter, and why it is โ€œworse than nothing.โ€ Now I feel I went too easy.

An issue last week focused on our corner of the communication business, executive communication. “When I saw said Axios piece last week,” said an exec comms director I know, “I was wondering if I was having a stroke because the exec comms advice was such a nothingburger.”

The main story leaned like a drunk to a lampost on a brainless study of trends in executive speaking by a company that produces โ€œevent management software.โ€ What would they know about executive communication? Things like this: โ€œHalf of planners also say that attendee engagement is one of the three most important gauges for success.โ€

The next story quoted inexplicably unnamed โ€œexecutive communication experts Axios spoke with,โ€ demonstrating their magnificent grasp of the obvious: โ€œEstablish expectations for every speaking engagement, conference or event before making a commitment.โ€ On second thought, no wonder they donโ€™t want attribution.

And finally, the piece quoted Leigh Gallager, a senior manager at the management consultancy Teneo, as saying: โ€œYes,

Professional Speechwriters Association

The Professional Speechwriters Associationโ€™s

Speechwriting School Online

MAY - JUN 2025

Professional Speechwriters Association

The Professional Speechwriters Associationโ€™s

Professional Development Academy

ON DEMAND

Professional Speechwriters Association

The Professional Speechwriters Associationโ€™s

Custom Workshops

Our trainers come to you.

LEARN MORE

Custom Workshops

Our trainers come to you.
present an opportunity for executives to share a corporate narrative or any critical messaging, but thereโ€™s also a benefit in showing that a CEO is accessible, relatable and capable of answering questions in a live setting. Audiences want to witness authentic moments, so it can be an effective way for leaders to raise their profile by being seen, heard and getting their message across in what is often perceived as a more off-the-cuff way.โ€

Gallager is implying that rather than hear a long, boring speech, audiences would prefer โ€œauthentic moments,โ€ like โ€œoff-the-cuffโ€ conversation. 

And since Axios would never, could never, contradict one of its sources or even push them to defend their pink-slime bromides, itโ€™s down to me to ask Gallager, rhetorically: Is it that audiences donโ€™t prefer leaders who can share fresh points of view powerfully through sustained oratory? Or is it that theyโ€™ve been trained by experience to expect that CEOsโ€™ speeches will be tedious parades of platitudes. In which case, yeah, theyโ€™d rather see the executive shamble verbally without a net, than with one.

I like a fireside chat as much as the next conference organizer and conference speaker. Theyโ€™re easy.

But the only ideas I remember after 30 years of organizing and attending conferences, came from great speeches. And I remember plenty.

โ€œDo you remember that brilliant panel discussion, back in 2003?โ€ said no one everโ€”adding, โ€œDo you remember that meaningful article, from Axios?โ€

Leave a Reply

Download Whitepaper

Thank you for your interest. Please enter your email address to view the report.