A party foul, to say the least
March 17, 2021
Former Trump speechwriter Stephen Miller pans President Biden's speechwriters, draws fire from us.
Thereโs an unwritten tradition that the previous president doesnโt criticize the sitting president.
Thereโs an unnecessary tradition that the previous presidentโs speechwriters donโt critique the sitting presidentโs scribes. Unnecessary, because it always went without saying.
Until Stephen Miller went on Fox Business last week and panned President Bidenโs address to the nation on the anniversary of the COVID shutdown. The chief Trump speechwriter called out Bidenโs speechwriters specifically.
โIt was so gloomy. It didnโt inspire or uplift at allโฆ. They are deliberately setting extraordinarily low on ambitious, uninspiring goals on the theory that they can exceed these incredibly dismal [projections].โ
Miller went on to say that Bidenโs stated goal of safe gatherings for Independence Day may be one of the โleast insipring calls-to-action in human history. โฆ If we stay closed, if we suffer, if we struggle, if we sacrifice, if we hurt, then maybe, just maybe, Larry, on July 4, you can have dinner with your own family in your own backyard. I couldnโt believe it.โ
Well gee, after four years of living in Millerโs rhetorical village of American Carnage (pop 322 million), a nice July 4 picnic sounds pretty hopeful to me.
But safe summertime grilling wasnโt good enough for Miller, who said, โNews flash to the Biden administration, people have been doing that throughout the pandemic with their family members. John F. Kennedy said letโs put a man on the moon. Donald Trump said letโs put a man on Mars. Joe Biden said letโs see if you can eat BBQ ribs with your own relatives and loved ones July 4.โ
What kind of post-COVID presidential moonshot would have satisfied Miller? Guilt-free gang bangs, by Easter? Napoleon said a leader is a dealer in hope, not a dealer in dope.
Miller also said he detected an undertone in Bidenโs speech that threatened further lockdowns.
The speechwriters clearlyย thought it would be an effectiveย cudgel to threaten people with an โor else.โย Thatโs not how you inspireย peopleโฆ Itโs not the American rhetorical tradition.ย People respond to positiveย energy, to optimism, to painting aย picture of what can be achievedย in the best of circumstances.
The young man must have been too busy in the White House to read Erik Larsonโs book about Winston Churchill as the rest of us did last spring, to contemplate how the British people responded to the bracing rhetoric of American leadership communication hero Winston Churchill. โIf this long island story of ours is to end at last,โ Churchill said in a radio address in 1940, โlet it end only when each one of us lies choking in his own blood upon the ground.โ
Suddenly, a cold can of White Claw doesnโt sound so bad!
How about this, Stephen Miller:
Morally conscientious speechwriters wonโt tell you how to rhetorically race-bait, obfuscate, prevaricate, bomb-throw, fear-monger or poison the well.
And you donโt tell those speechwriters how to write comforting, rhetorically responsible speeches during hard times.
And finally: Stephen Miller, if you want to learn how to be a better human being and a more helpful communicator, youโre still young, thereโs still time and people have made dramatic conversions before.ย