A party foul, to say the least

Former Trump speechwriter Stephen Miller pans President Biden's speechwriters, draws fire from us.

Thereโ€™s an unwritten tradition that the previous president doesnโ€™t criticize the sitting president. 

Thereโ€™s an unnecessary tradition that the previous presidentโ€™s speechwriters donโ€™t critique the sitting presidentโ€™s scribes. Unnecessary, because it always went without saying.

Until Stephen Miller went on Fox Business last week and panned President Bidenโ€™s address to the nation on the anniversary of the COVID shutdown. The chief Trump speechwriter called out Bidenโ€™s speechwriters specifically.

โ€œIt was so gloomy. It didnโ€™t inspire or uplift at allโ€ฆ. They are deliberately setting extraordinarily low on ambitious, uninspiring goals on the theory that they can exceed these incredibly dismal [projections].โ€

Miller went on to say that Bidenโ€™s stated goal of safe gatherings for Independence Day may be one of the โ€œleast insipring calls-to-action in human history. โ€ฆ If we stay closed, if we suffer, if we struggle, if we sacrifice, if we hurt, then maybe, just maybe, Larry, on July 4, you can have dinner with your own family in your own backyard. I couldnโ€™t believe it.โ€

Well gee, after four years of living in Millerโ€™s rhetorical village of American Carnage (pop 322 million), a nice July 4 picnic sounds pretty hopeful to me.

But safe summertime grilling wasnโ€™t good enough for Miller, who said, โ€œNews flash to the Biden administration, people have been doing that throughout the pandemic with their family members. John F. Kennedy said letโ€™s put a man on the moon. Donald Trump said letโ€™s put a man on Mars. Joe Biden said letโ€™s see if you can eat BBQ ribs with your own relatives and loved ones July 4.โ€

What kind of post-COVID presidential moonshot would have satisfied Miller? Guilt-free gang bangs, by Easter? Napoleon said a leader is a dealer in hope, not a dealer in dope.

Miller also said he detected an undertone in Bidenโ€™s speech that threatened further lockdowns.

The speechwriters clearlyย thought it would be an effectiveย cudgel to threaten people with an โ€œor else.โ€ย Thatโ€™s not how you inspireย peopleโ€ฆ Itโ€™s not the American rhetorical tradition.ย People respond to positiveย energy, to optimism, to painting aย picture of what can be achievedย in the best of circumstances.

The young man must have been too busy in the White House to read Erik Larsonโ€™s book about Winston Churchill as the rest of us did last spring, to contemplate how the British people responded to the bracing rhetoric of American leadership communication hero Winston Churchill. โ€œIf this long island story of ours is to end at last,โ€ Churchill said in a radio address in 1940, โ€œlet it end only when each one of us lies choking in his own blood upon the ground.โ€

Suddenly, a cold can of White Claw doesnโ€™t sound so bad!

How about this, Stephen Miller: 

Morally conscientious speechwriters wonโ€™t tell you how to rhetorically race-bait, obfuscate, prevaricate, bomb-throw, fear-monger or poison the well.

And you donโ€™t tell those speechwriters how to write comforting, rhetorically responsible speeches during hard times.

And finally: Stephen Miller, if you want to learn how to be a better human being and a more helpful communicator, youโ€™re still young, thereโ€™s still time and people have made dramatic conversions before.ย 

Leave a Reply

Download Whitepaper

Thank you for your interest. Please enter your email address to view the report.