The Conversation We’re Not Having, About Gas

Energy companies need a seat at the table. But if we want that seatโ€”we have to earn it.

Introduction

  • Hello everyone and thank you for joining.
  • It feels like the last few times weโ€™ve come together, our industry has been on a rollercoaster ride โ€“ and as we meet now, it still feels like weโ€™re on the same rideโ€ฆ we just hope weโ€™re almost at the end. 
  • But amid a lingering pandemic, volatile markets and industry upheaval โ€“ members of the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers have done a phenomenal job. Focusing on the job in handโ€ฆ getting the energy where itโ€™s neededโ€ฆ serving customers and communities.
  • And we do that despite the noise surrounding us.
  • I donโ€™t just mean the clang of metal, the drone of machinery or the whirr of helicopters.
  • I mean the debates and conversationsโ€ฆ the many voices discussing the future energy landscape, the rise of renewables, the decline of hydrocarbons. 
  • But when thereโ€™s a lot of chatter โ€“ sometimes itโ€™s not the conversations you can hear the loudest that matter the most.
  • But the ones you canโ€™t – the whispers in the corner, the snatched words in the corridor.
  • And amid the din in our room, thereโ€™s one big conversation that we need to be having much more loudly.
  • Itโ€™s about natural gas โ€“ and its role in the future energy system.
  • โ€œHold on,โ€ I hear you say. โ€œWeโ€™ve just been through what some have called a โ€˜global gas crisisโ€™, COP26 came to a major agreement on methane โ€“ and major industry regulators proposed new methane rules. What do you mean nobodyโ€™s talking about gas?โ€
  • Well, Iโ€™ve heard some of that too, and itโ€™s important. 
  • But to my mind – a lot of the conversation weโ€™re hearing misses the bigger picture. 
  • Let me explain.

Brussels

  • A short time ago, I was in Brussels for work.
  • At one event, we were talking about the role of natural gas.
  • And there was a gentleman there โ€“ I wonโ€™t say where he worked but letโ€™s just say he wore a suit. And he didnโ€™t want to engage with our industry โ€“ at all.
  • He was disinterested, dismissive. Perhaps a little rude. And made it clear that he felt gas should not be part of the future energy mix.
  • After the event, as we were packing up, he asked me: โ€œarenโ€™t you ashamed of working in oil and gas?โ€
  • That took me slightly by surprise.
  • But I told him โ€“ โ€œnoโ€. I was proud. 
  • Then he continued: all this talk of the role of gas โ€“ itโ€™s just your industry looking for a lifeline.

Why?

  • That was a wake-up call for me โ€“ many people see gas as a problematic energy source that might be tolerable in the short-term โ€“ but should be avoided in the long-term.
  • And if we do not change the discussion around gas, weโ€™ll not just be excluded from the conversation โ€“ but we may not even be allowed into the room.

Case for gas

  • If Iโ€™m honest, I think a big reason for that is down to our industry โ€“ weโ€™ve been a little presumptive.
  • After all, we know why the world needs gas โ€“ and why we produce it. And how it can help accelerate the shift to lower carbon:
    • Displacing coal in emerging economies. 
    • Providing a reliable source of energy to supplement the intermittency of renewables. 
    • And looking ahead, offering a low carbon energy source, when combined with CCUS and converted into blue hydrogen. 
  • In short, it is one of the biggest levers the world has to get to net zero.
  • Perhaps weโ€™ve assumed everyone else sees it the same way. 
  • But many people donโ€™t. 
  • And thatโ€™s a problem.
  • Not just for our industry. But for the world.
  • Because if gas is not seen as a viable part of the future energy system โ€“ if it is not seen as a solution โ€“ then:
    • Either the world wonโ€™t get enough of the gas it needs โ€“ which could hinder economic growth, stifle opportunities and hamper human development.
    • Or gas might not be produced responsibly, perhaps without enough of a focus on reducing emissions – and the world cannot hit net zero.

Winning a seat at the table

  • So I think we agree that we need to be at the table โ€“ part of the conversation and informing decisions. 
  • But if we want that seat โ€“ we have to earn it.
  • And to do that, we need three things:
  • First, our industry โ€“ needs to get our house in order on methane. Thatโ€™s true all the way along the gas value chain. Because our existence as an industry – our licence to operate โ€“ hinges on society accepting what we do.
  • And we will lose that licence if we donโ€™t get methane under control. 
  • What do I mean?
    • We need to detect and measure methane emissions โ€“ and I mean every producer committing to this. Technology is making this easier โ€“ and cheaper to do. And we cannot afford to delay.
    • Then we have to reduce those emissions with every tool available – allocating substantial resources into preventing methane escaping.
    • Youโ€™ve seen the coverage in the global media recently โ€“ COP26 focussing on the need to reduce methane โ€“ US and EU regulators taking action. 
    • If it wasnโ€™t already obvious, we need to act โ€“ and act now. And I would say that is a good starting point for IOGP members to get behind the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP) – either by joining or committing to equivalence.
  • As you will hear today IOGP already plays a strong role developing industry standards โ€“ and stands ready to assist others in the industry as we work to reduce methane emissions.
  • Second, as well as tackling methane, we need to take more action on CO2
    • An obvious point โ€“ but itโ€™s one thing stopping the unburnt methane getting into the atmosphere. Itโ€™s another thing addressing the CO2 thatโ€™s released when the methane is burnt.
    • And the answer here is really about kick-starting CCUS.
    • Thereโ€™s a lot of talk โ€“ perhaps a lot of excitement about the transformative potential of this technology.
    • But to make that a reality โ€“ we canโ€™t wait. We need fewer reports and feasibility studies and more steel in the ground.
    • And yes, that means spending hard dollars now.
  • Third, we need to work with policymakers. We all have aims weโ€™re trying to reach โ€“ whether at company, national or international level.
    • We need to see each other not as hindrances to getting to our destination โ€“ but as allies who can help us get there.
    • I firmly believe that policy and industry innovation should work hand-in-hand. And the most long-lasting, transformative changes occur when that happens.
    • Weโ€™ve seen that before with tailpipe regulation turbocharging the development of electric vehicles.
    • We need a similar shift if we want to make blue hydrogen a widespread reality โ€“ and if we want to see ground-breaking projects like Net Zero Teesside become the norm.
    • The good news is we know this can work โ€“ take the relaunched Oil and Gas Methane Partnership. A voluntary initiative which now has more than 70 company signatories, many of which are IOGP members.  It has, in a short period of time, become a de facto standard and has the backing of governments and the EU Commission.
  • So we know we can make this work:
    • That we can do more to demonstrate our industry is serious about bringing emissions down.
    • We know we can play a positive role in helping the world reach net zero.
    • And we know we can โ€“ and must โ€“ work with policymakers to advance the energy transition.
  • And letโ€™s remember, whether we win a seat at the table doesnโ€™t just matter to us.
  • Millions of people rely on the products we produce.
  • And billions of people need the world to get to net zero.
  • So there is no room for complacency. And there is every reason to act.

The worldโ€™s lifeline

  • As I think back to that interaction in Brussels โ€“ with that gentleman in a suit saying, โ€œyour industry is just looking for a lifeline.โ€
  • I remember my response was instinctive. I told him โ€œitโ€™s not our industry looking for a lifeline. Itโ€™s our industry offering the world a lifeline.โ€
  • Thatโ€™s the truth โ€“ but itโ€™s not enough.
  • We need to show him โ€“ and the many others in capitals across the world.
  • And while Iโ€™m fairly sure I didnโ€™t convince him, I know we cannot afford to be excluded from the conversation any longer.
  • So letโ€™s show weโ€™re serious, show weโ€™re in action โ€“ win our seat at the table.
  • And letโ€™s make sure that this is a conversation that we can not only hear โ€“ but a conversation everyone is paying attention to.
  • Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Download Whitepaper

Thank you for your interest. Please enter your email address to view the report.