Deconstructing a blog entry

The New York Times lauded it as an example of how, โ€œin the age of transparency, the layoff will be blogged.โ€ We hope theyโ€™re blogged better than this.

Late last year Vital Speeches editors were by alerted by The New York Times to a CEO’s blog entry. The Times article ballyhooed the notion that โ€œIn the age of transparency, the layoff will be blogged.โ€

The piece explained, โ€œElon Musk, chief executive of the electric-car company Tesla Motors in San Carlos, Calif., said he had no choice other than to blog about the … layoffs at the closely watched companyโ€”even though some employees had not been told they were losing their jobs.โ€

Apparently the news had already been leaked to a Silicon Valley gossip blog, and Musk felt forced to blog. But he wasnโ€™t forced to write a blog entry as imperfectโ€”and rife with lessons for executive communicators supporting CEOs in uncertain timesโ€”as this one.

The blog is headlined, โ€œExtraordinary times require focus.โ€

Itโ€™s not exactly โ€œIt was the best of times, it was the worst of times,โ€ but it will have to do. Musk goes on:

These are extraordinary times. The global financial system has gone through the worst crisis since the Great Depression, and the effects are only beginning to wind their way through every facet of the economy. Itโ€™s not an understatement to say that nearly every business will be impacted by what has unfolded in the past weeks, and this is true for Silicon Valley as well.

So far, so goodโ€”and, luckily for Musk, many readers probably went no further than this because of the unreadable white-sans-serif-on-black-background body copy.

At Tesla, we have decided that the wise course of action is to focus on our two revenue producing business linesโ€”the Roadster and powertrain sales to other car companies. In the Roadster, Tesla has a unique product with a large order book that continues to grow, despite softness in the automobile sector. Our powertrain business is profitable today and is also growing rapidly.

First, whoโ€™s โ€œweโ€? Regarding decisions this momentous for all the organizationโ€™s constituencies, the CEO and/or a number of top leaders ought to take specific responsibility. The guy in the mailroom didnโ€™t decide. The accounts payable gal didnโ€™t decide. Who decided? Second: Youโ€™re going to โ€œfocus on our two revenue producing business linesโ€? This is like the old Army joke about the drill sergeant whoโ€™s trying to be sensitive as he breaks some news to a certain soldier. โ€œEverybody whose grandmother didnโ€™t die yesterday step forward. Not so fast, Murphy!โ€ You know the guy who blogs that heโ€™s going to โ€œfocus on our two revenue producing business linesโ€ went straight home to his wife and told her, โ€œWe dumped our eight loser lines today.โ€ Why should he be less candid with employees and others who really have skin in the game?

Our goal as a company is to be cash-flow positive within six to nine months. To do so, we must continue to ramp up our production rate, improve Roadster contribution margin and reduce operating expenses. At the same time, we must maintain high production quality and excellent customer service. โ€ฆ

When executives say, โ€œWe must cut costs, improve productivity and maintain quality,โ€ they need to anticipate (and address) the question from investors: If you could do all that without sacrificing a thing, why did you wait until now?

One of the steps I will be taking is raising the performance bar at Tesla to a very high level, which will result in a modest reduction in near term headcount. To be clear, this doesnโ€™t mean that the people that depart Tesla for this reason wouldnโ€™t be considered good performers at most companiesโ€”almost all would. However, I believe Tesla must adhere more closely to a special forces philosophy at this stage of its life if we aspire to become one of the great car companies of the 21st century.

The headcount reduction is modest if itโ€™s someone elseโ€™s head being reduced. Heโ€™s also stretching credulity to the breaking point by discussing in the same paragraph layoffs and becoming โ€œone of the great car companies of the 21st century.โ€

There will also be some headcount reduction due to consolidation of operations. In anticipation of moving vehicle engineering to our new HQ in San Jose, we are ramping down and will close our Rochester Hills office near Detroit. Good communication, tightly knit engineering and a common company culture are of paramount importance as Tesla grows. โ€ฆ

Again, heโ€™s acknowledging only in the most backhanded way that the company โ€”his companyโ€”had major problems before the financial downturn came along. Namely, a disorganized engineering operation, bad communication and an incoherent corporate culture.

The Tesla investors and I are unequivocally dedicated to ensuring the success of Tesla. If you have bought a car from Tesla or are thinking of doing so, please know that I personally stand behind delivering a product that you will love and continuing to develop new models in the future. We are not far from being cash flow positive, but, even if that threshold ends up being further than expected, I will do whatever is needed to ensure that Tesla has more than sufficient capital to get there.

The trouble is, after seeing so much apparent denial and reality-dodging in the above paragraphs Iโ€™m not sure I believe his promises. Do you?

Iโ€™d like to thank the loyal customers of Tesla that have stood by us through thick and thin. Beyond delivering a great Roadster, Tesla will find other ways to reward that loyalty, including among other things an exclusive preview of our upcoming Model S sedan.

This is the reason that internal communications have to be separate fromโ€”and in advance ofโ€”external communications. For the employees, and even investors, who found out about the layoffs through this blogโ€”or heard from their CEO on the subject for the first timeโ€”this โ€œexclusive preview of our upcoming Model S sedanโ€ business has to be infuriating. It may be unfair to single out this blog, which isnโ€™t spectacularly bad. But thatโ€™s why we did single it out: Because itโ€™s typically bad, and for that reason executive communicators everywhere are well advised to go forthโ€”and do otherwise.

Leave a Reply

Download Whitepaper

Thank you for your interest. Please enter your email address to view the report.