Bonfire of the Inanities
January 19, 2022
Corporate CEOs surely don't need me to attack The New York Times' adolescent smear last Sunday. But maybe The New York Times does.
If you didnโt read โCEOs Were Our Heroes โฆ At Least According to Themโ on the front page of the business section of Sundayโs New York Times, I understand. Reading the business section of The New York Times is like reading the sports section of Popular Mechanics.
But I read it, and sent it that morning to members of the Executive Communication Council, an organization that my company convenes, comprised of people who create communications for the most prominent CEOs in the world. I wanted to make sure theyโd seen this โbroadside,โ as I described it in my email, as neutrally as I could.
Then I took a couple days to let the piece cool a bit, before deciding whether to write about it.
Why? A few reasons: First, our members donโt need me to defend CEOs; to the extent that CEOs can be the phony, sanctimonious creeps the Times describes, no one knows it better than these people; Iโve heard many stories over many drinks over many years. Second, CEOs themselves donโt need defending from the likes of me.
Still, this piece: Bonfire of inanities!

First off, its premise, that CEOs think theyโre civilizationโs greatest heroes, is based solely on one speech, delivered by one CEO at a virtual meeting fo the World Economic Forum last year. Iโve been producing a newsletter called the Executive Communication Report that has regularly recorded โwhat leaders are saying, and how theyโre sounding,โ since the beginning of COVID, and Benioffโs is the single most self-congratulatory bit of CEO rhetoric Iโve heard in all that time, and there is no second place.
โIn this pandemic, it was CEOs in many cases all over the world, who were heroes,โ Benioff said. โTheyโre the ones who stepped forward with their financial resources, their corporate resources their employees, their factories, and pivoted rapidlyโnot for profit, but to save the world.โ
The Times writer, global economics correspondent Peter S. Goodman, uses that as a jumping off point to accuse every CEO who uses the word โstakeholderโ to โdemonstrate that they care about loftier matters than private jets, oceanfront mansions and other paraphernalia of wealth. โฆ They worry about the vitality of the communities down there, in the shade of their skyscraper headquarters. They prefer that polar bears not succumb to heatstroke and that homeless people be housed somewhere โฆ.โ After a few lines like that, I checked, just to make sure Peter Goodman is over the age of 15. He seems to be.
When his adolescent characterizations begin to wear threadbare, Goodman goes back to that same virtual Benioff speech a year ago, and quotes from it again.
โCEOs stepped up,โ Benioff said. โWe would not be where we are in the world today without the outstanding leadership of many, many CEOs who did heroic work all over the world to basically save their communities.โ
Of course, Benioff was speaking to CEOs in that talk; when I have spoken to CEOsโ speechwriters over the last couple of years, Iโve said some pretty generous things, about how they have helped their leaders lead through some of the hardest times of our lives. Thatโs one of the things you do at conferences, be they of CEOs, speechwriters, or heating and cooling contractors (who kept Americans comfortable during our long weeks and months of lockdown).
Now Goodman is scoffing at Benioff for being โan archetype of a species that has become known as Davos Man, people (mostly men) whose wealth and power are so vast that they are able to write the rules for the rest of us.โ Next, Goodman reminds us how well Americaโs billionaires are doing (which doesnโt correlate 1:1 with corporate CEOs, but fuck rich people, right?). โThe beneficiaries have succeeded in sharing little of their gains with the government, a wildly successful mode of tax avoidance that is largely legal. In a triumph of lobbying, the billionaire class has slated the tax code with boondoggles and starved tax collectors of resources.โ
And lest the reader begins to groggily draw a distinction between American capitalism and tax policy and the individual human beings who run American corporations, back to Benioffโs old speech we go.
โCEOs are gathering every week to figure out how we can improve the state of the world and get through this pandemic,โ Benioff said. โAnd look against the dysfunction of governments and nongovernmental organizations over the last year. They were not the ones who saved us.โ
The main government Benioff was referring to was Trumpโs, of course. Clearly, Goodman is running low on outrageous statements from that one speech. And then the piece really gets rich, when Goodman acknowledges that Benioff โis by many indications a true believer. In 2015, when Indiana proceeded with legislation that would have allowed businesses to discriminate against gay, lesbian and transgender employees, he threatened to yank investment, forcing a change in the law. He shamed Facebook and Google for abusing huge public trust and called for regulations on search and social media giants. Early in the pandemic, Salesforce embraced remote work to protect employees.โ
Goodman goes on to detail Benioffโs efforts to ease homelessness in San Franciscoโand policies heโs implemented encouraging his employees to spend work time philanthropically. And then he writes about his own interactions with Benioff: โI found myself won over by his boyish enthusiasm and his willingness to talk at length absent public relations minders, a rarity for Silicon Valleyโโand perhaps Benioffโs main mistake. I donโt know his speechwriter, but I know hundreds of others, none of whom would have written that โCEOs are heroesโ stuff, at least without smothering it enough caveats to choke a platitudypus.
The articleโs conclusion is one last perfect example of Goodmanโs bad form:
The day after Christmas, as many Americans absorbed the alarming rise of Omicron cases while struggling to purchase home COVID test kits, Mr. Benioff tweeted a photo of himself on what appeared to be a sailboat, a tropical island behind him in the blue-green sea. He sported mirrored sunglasses as he grinned triumphantly alongside Lars Ulrich, the drummer for Metallica.
So much for the talk of humanity unbounded. Here was Davos Man reveling in his private domain.
Hit jobs like this are as tasty as eggs Benedict on a Sunday morning. But one must ask, as one wipes oneโs beard, โWhat have I learned here?โ In this case, Peter S. Goodman took a couple thousand words in The New York Times to tell his readers that:
โข CEOs talk more about poverty and other global problems than actually experience them, firsthand.
โข Many CEOs think a lot of themselves. (Many non-CEOs, too.)
โข Some of the problems CEOs say they want to solve are connected with the capitalist system which is making them rich.
โข CEOs take nice vacations.
Did any reader of The New York Times need to learn that?
Did you?
We tend to shake our heads at the right-wing rube or the arrested-development libertarian or the simple-minded liberal who expresses contempt for โall politicians.โ (Gee, fellas, when you throw them all out, who are you going to replace them with? More politicians!)
Well, in a society as economically and culturally tied to the business practices of huge corporationsโand in a society as bereft of strong leadership in generalโthe same should go for people who hate all CEOs.
Which I shouldnโt have to tell the global economics correspondent for a major newspaper.